Quality at the required task
Use representative documents and exceptions to compare models. Count the cases that need human correction or cannot be completed.

Data location is one part of the decision. Model quality, access, support, updates and recovery matter too. Welf helps you assess a deployment boundary and build the workflow that can operate inside it.
Deployment decision
Choose where the workflow runs based on the data it uses and the task it performs. Assess access controls, monitoring and compliance requirements alongside hosting.
On smaller screens, scroll sideways to compare all columns.
| Model | Why consider it | Operational trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| Managed model endpoint | Access to a provider-operated model where the data terms and processing locations fit the task. | Provider dependency, retention settings, network access and change management need review. |
| Dedicated private cloud | Workloads and data services run in a customer-controlled cloud environment. | Your team needs an operating model for identity, networking, capacity, patching and support. |
| On-premises or isolated | The intended use requires local infrastructure or tightly restricted connectivity. | Model availability, hardware capacity, updates and recovery become explicit engineering responsibilities. |
The complete data path
Map source documents, embeddings, caches, logs, backups and support access. Decide retention and deletion across the whole workflow.
Cost and service quality
A low inference price can hide expensive review or infrastructure. Evaluate the workload at realistic volumes and concurrency.
Use representative documents and exceptions to compare models. Count the cases that need human correction or cannot be completed.
Test document size, peak demand and response time. Account for idle capacity, queues and the cost of making the service available when work arrives.
Assign monitoring, patching, model changes, incident response and recovery tests. Include these responsibilities in the operating budget.

Capacity with perspective
Extraction, retrieval and difficult reasoning do not necessarily need the same model. Test smaller models where they meet the task requirements and reserve more expensive routes for cases that justify them.
Discuss the architectureQuestions before we start
Only if the complete architecture is designed that way. Document extraction, embeddings, inference, telemetry, support tools and backups can each create an external data path. We map these before choosing services.
Where their license, quality and operating requirements fit. Evaluate them on the actual workflow and include the cost of hosting, updating and supporting the model.
We can design interfaces and retain evaluation cases to make a change more manageable. A provider change still requires testing of quality, permissions, cost and system behavior.
Bring the intended workflow, data constraints, expected demand and existing infrastructure. We can compare the deployment options against the work.
Start a conversation